EHTO TELMED: The Impact of Telematics on the Healthcare Sector
Home Documents Telmed: Interim Report
Back Table of contents Next
Updated: Sep 17, 97 

TELMED

3.3.2 How are telematics applications implemented?: Distribution patterns

i) The level of coverage

The audit identified a total of 277 examples of telematics applications for healthcare currently being implemented across Europe. As discussed above in Section 1, the audit specifically targeted 'live' applications - those providing an ongoing service for healthcare users, and excluded RTD development currently ongoing in Fourth Framework Programmes. However, as Figures 1 and 2 show, much of the current spread of telematics applications for healthcare remains in the form of experimental or pilot projects, reinforcing the conclusions of the preliminary TELMED review of state of the art, reported in Deliverable 1, of a still immature and embryonic market. Only 17% of the 277 applications identified are established services, with 42% pilot projects and 35% research and development experiments. The relatively subordinate role currently being played by the commercial sector is underlined by the strong representation of initiatives being driven by national government programmes. These Programmes are primarily communications infrastructure development and implementation. Examples include the Transparent' programme operating in the Netherlands, which is geared towards promoting the use of generic data exchange systems in hospitals and other service provision points, and large scale NHS programmes in the UK that are geared towards promoting the transition from paper-based to electronic messaging and data storage systems throughout the healthcare services.

ii) Geographical distribution

Figure 3 shows the geographical distribution of applications across Europe, by country. As the Figure shows, the implementation of telematics for healthcare has been unevenly spread across Europe. The largest concentrations of applications development and implementation are in the Netherlands, UK and France, which together account for 60% of the total 277 applications identified by the Audit. Activity in Italy, Greece and Germany has run at a significantly lower level (around 5% of the total). The lowest activity levels are found in Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Luxembourg, Austria and Switzerland. There has been a significant degree of trans-national collaboration in telematics for healthcare, with just under 10% of applications providing some form of international network provision. The type of service provided varies from 'true' trans-national integrated services (providing, for example, medical information) to networks of single sites in different European countries.

The cross-national pattern masks considerable regional variations in applications distribution. Three main clusters can be distinguished:

  1. Integrated community health care 'packages' - focusing mainly on telesurveillance and community health monitoring, and remote telediagnosis connecting primary and specialist care networks. These are mainly found in remote and rural regions. The main centres are in France (Midi-Pyrenees; the Toulouse region; Nord Pays de Calais and Acquitaine); Wales; Scotland (Orkney and the North Sea oil fields); Italy (Emilio-Romagna and the Southern Islands) and Scandinavia (Oulou and Etala, Finland).
  2. Teleradiology and telepathology - focusing on the storage and dissemination of medical images, and localised mainly in Scandinavia, for example, Gallivare in Sweden and Tromso, Norway.
  3. EDI, hospital information systems and electronic patient dossiers - these tend to be in the form of large-scale infrastructure networks, providing messaging systems, integrated regional administration networks for hospitals and 'smart card' systems. They are mainly concentrated in northern Europe, and particularly in the Netherlands (Westland, Scheiland, Delftland, Rotterdam and Maastricht); France (Dordogne, Gironde, Marseilles, Lyon and Paris) and in Denmark.

iii) Types of applications: sectoral distribution

Classification of applications on a sectoral basis is a problematic exercise. Healthcare telematics applications operate as socio-technical systems in particular socio-cultural and organisational contexts. These systems embody a number of inter-connected 'facets' including: technical configurations (the communications systems, platforms, software systems and media through which products and services are delivered); the domain content of applications (the specific healthcare domain in which they operate); the users targeted by the applications and the institutional and organisational context in which they are used.

In relation to technical configurations, Figures 4 to 6 show the range of communications infrastructure, communications media and tools identified by the Audit.

The Figures show:

The user groups addressed by the range of service provision identified includes both direct end users and intermediate users (Figure 7). Hospitals account for 37% of the total users audited, where the main demand is for integrated administration systems and electronic patient records. GPs account for around 20% of the users, largely in the form of patient records and telediagnosis services integrating primary and secondary care. Patients themselves account for a smaller proportion of users - 14% - and in this case the market segmentation is primarily in the form of applications developed to provide home support for 'at risk' groups (for example telesurveillance of elderly people). Insurance companies are a minority - but growing - user group, with an interest mainly in smart cards to store medical and health insurance data.

Telematics applications are represented across a wide spectrum of health care domains, as illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3: Healthcare Domains
%

General Information Systems (billing; insurance; patient data; appointments; medical protocols and standards; health promotion info)

39

General MRI, X-rays

7

Clinical consultations

7

General Practitioner medicine

7

Psychiatric

6

A&E

4

General pathology

4

Maternity, paediatric

4

Cardiac

4

Neurosurgery

3

Pharmacology

2

Diabetes

2

Cancers

2

Dermatology

2

Home care

1

Marine A&E

1

Genetics; toxicology; respiratory; neontology; asthma; enecephalic; surgery; cranial surgery; geriatric; ulcers; dieticians; anaesthetists; rheumatology; gastroenterology

< 1

The Table shows:

As discussed above, the applications audit involved a mapping of the implementation of telematics applications for healthcare using a classification framework based on indicative generic 'applications environments'. These indicative typologies denote configurations of technological artefacts within a particular institutional setting and providing services for specific user groups. Drawing on the results of the state of the art review carried out in Deliverable 1, TELMED adopted a classification based on the following:

Figure 8 shows the distribution of applications identified by the audit across these categories.

The Figure shows:

It should be emphasised that the broad sectoral categories discussed above do not represent mutually exclusive telematics scenarios for healthcare. Commonly, a particular application or intervention will embody a range of generic products and services, for example utilising EDI infrastructure networks and medical imaging applications to provide telediagnosis services for users. We discuss the pattern of different combinations in more detail in the next section of this report. An alternative classification model, however, is to consider the 'setting' or 'scenario of use' in which products and services are delivered. Setting or scenario denotes both a spatial context, which refers to the geographical area covered by the application, but also an organisational boundedness within which different actors interact. The spread of scenarios of use identified by the audit is shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Scenarios of Use: Classification

Scenario
Description
Example

Single site

Applications environment facilitates interaction between user groups in one spatial and organisational setting HIS system linking different departments in one hospital
Single provider Environment involves a single provider but within an open network Single GP practice providing telesurveillance to distributed user group
Inter-site Local network of sites PACS system linking several hospitals in an area
Local network Local network of dispersed providers EPR linking networks of local GP practices
Regional Network Integrated multi-service care provision within a region Regional community health care system
National network National/transnational system UK EDI programme for the NHS
Single user Services for single individual users Remote support for diabetics patients at home
Network users Networks of recipients of service provision Electronic bulletin boards for NGOs/ patient networks

Figure 9 shows the distribution of scenarios of use identified by the Audit. The Figure shows:

iv) Who is involved? Partnership arrangements identified

Figure 10 shows the relative representation of main participants involved in implementing telematics applications for healthcare in Europe.

The Figure shows:

As is the case for applications environments generally, however, in reality the distribution of telematics for healthcare in Europe involves a diverse range of collaborative participation between different types of actor, within different types of partnership arrangement. As Figure 11 shows, the majority of applications identified by the audit are 'multiple configurations' of combinations of applications environments integrating a range of tools and platforms in different types of partnership arrangements with multiple groups of users.

The audit identified five main types of partnership clusters, illustrated schematically in Figure 12. These were:

Community care partnerships - reflecting 'embedded' local interventions typically involving networks of GPs in collaboration with local political institutions.

Figure 12: Partnership Clusters


[ Introduction ] [ Note on Authorship ]
[ Table of Contents ] [ Document (Section 1) ]
[ Send your comments ] [ View comments ]

Back Table of contents Next Next
Back to the Main Page
Copyright 1997 © EHTO All rights reserved
This server is the only official EHTO WWW knowledge repository.
Mail suggestions to: webmaster@ehto.org